Source and Citation Standards

My Point of Aesthetics is committed to providing accurate and reliable information. Our articles on design, architecture, and the built environment draw upon verifiable sources. This page outlines our standards for source selection, citation, and verification.

Authoritative Source Types

We prioritize sources recognized for their expertise and factual integrity within their respective fields. This ensures the information presented on mypoa.ae is trustworthy and well-supported.

Academic and Peer-Reviewed Publications: Journals and books from university presses focusing on architecture, urban planning, design theory, ergonomics, and art history.
Professional Organizations: Publications, reports, and standards issued by established bodies like the American Institute of Architects (AIA) or the International Ergonomics Association (IEA).
Government and Official Bodies: Building codes, historical records, and policy documents from municipal, national, or international governmental agencies.
Museums and Cultural Institutions: Catalogs, exhibition texts, and scholarly articles published by reputable museums and design archives.
Recognized Experts: Books and articles by individuals with verified academic credentials or extensive professional experience in relevant aesthetic or technical fields.
Reputable Industry Publications: Established trade magazines and journals with strong editorial oversight and a history of factual reporting in design, interiors, or architecture.

Citation Format

Transparency in sourcing allows readers to explore topics further and verify information independently. We use a clear and consistent citation style across all articles.

Online Sources: Direct hyperlinks are embedded within the article text. These links point directly to the specific page or document where the information originated.
Print and Offline Sources: For books, reports, or physical archives, we provide footnotes or endnotes. These include the author, title, publication year, and publisher or archival reference.

Source Verification Process

Every source undergoes a rigorous verification process before inclusion in our content. Our editorial team checks the credibility and accuracy of all cited information.

Author Credibility: We confirm the author’s expertise, academic background, and institutional affiliations relevant to the subject matter.
Publication Authority: The reputation and editorial standards of the publishing body are assessed. For academic papers, we verify peer-review status.
Factual Cross-Referencing: Key claims and data points are cross-referenced with additional independent authoritative sources whenever possible.
Recency and Relevance: We evaluate the publication date to ensure the information is current, especially for technical standards or evolving design trends.

Policy on Anonymous Sources

My Point of Aesthetics avoids using anonymous or unnamed sources. Our commitment to transparency requires open identification of all informational origins.

In extremely rare cases, where safety or privacy concerns are paramount, an unnamed source might be considered. Such exceptions require approval from a senior editor and independent corroboration from at least two other verifiable sources. We do not publish content reliant solely on anonymous claims.

Primary vs. Secondary Sources

We prioritize primary sources to provide readers with direct access to original information. Primary sources in our niche include original architectural drawings, design specifications, historical documents, or direct interviews with creators.

Secondary sources offer analysis, interpretation, or synthesis of primary data. Examples include academic critiques of design movements or biographical works on architects. While valuable for context and perspective, secondary sources must themselves be authoritative and well-cited. We use them to build understanding, not as a substitute for direct evidence.

Reader Verification of Sources

Readers can easily verify the sources cited in our articles. All online citations are linked directly to their original location. For print sources, full bibliographic details allow for easy lookup.

We encourage readers to explore the original documents and publications we reference. If you have questions about any specific source, please contact our editorial team at [email protected].

Handling Disputed Sources

Accuracy is fundamental to our mission. If a reader believes a source is incorrect or misused, we invite them to inform us immediately.

Reporting a Dispute: Please send details of the disputed source and your concerns to [email protected]. Provide specific reasons for your dispute.
Editorial Review: Our editorial team will review the claim promptly. We will re-examine the original source and cross-reference information with other authoritative materials.
Correction and Update: If an error or misinterpretation is found, we will correct the article and update the source information. We aim for transparency in all corrections.

Last Updated: March 2026